4648702: On Microsoft Windows 2000 and Windows XP, a
TextArea will sometimes display only a vertical
scrollbar, even though the SCROLLBARS_BOTH field is
set to true.
4636311: Modal dialogs may hang when run from a
Runnable on release 1.3.1 and 1.4.
4385243: Unable to input text in Microsoft Windows
locales that don't have an ANSI code page (such as Hindi).
4690831: Game applets fail to repaint properly with
Internet Explorer.
4627627: Focus traversal keys moved from awt.properties
to Preferences API.
4636548/ 4639735: Crash of release 1.4 when screensaver on
Microsoft Windows 2000 is activated.
4379138: Problems on Linux with key events for some dead
keys.
4627542: Swing applications don't support international
keyboards under Linux.
4395157: Under Linux on 1.3, can't type "%" in
applets.
4669873: A drag and drop bug, reported on hopper-beta
under Microsoft Windows, caused an application to briefly freeze
during DnD and is fixed in the final release of 1.4.1.
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4290675.
A new focus subsystem replaces the previous focus architecture
and addresses many focus-related bugs caused by platform
inconsistencies, and incompatibilities between AWT and Swing
components. See the new Focus Model
Specification for further details.
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4281163.
Many environments, such as mainframe machines and dedicated
servers, do not support a display, keyboard, or mouse. Headless
support is enabled by the new GraphicsEnvironment
methods isHeadless and
isHeadlessInstance. These methods indicate whether a
display, keyboard, and mouse can be supported in a graphics
environment.
The API changes for headless include:
A new public exception class, java.awt.HeadlessException,
is introduced. It is derived from
UnsupportedOperationException, which derives from
RuntimeException, so that existing implementations of
methods that throw the new exception will not require signature
changes.
Two new methods, are added to
java.awt.GraphicsEnvironment.
The constructors of Applet and all heavyweight
components (*) are changed to throw HeadlessException
if a display, keyboard, and mouse are not supported by the toolkit
implementation. All javadoc tags on all constructors are changed to
reflect this RuntimeException.
The Robot constructor throws an
AWTException if a display, keyboard, and mouse are not
supported by the toolkit implementation.
Many of the methods in Toolkit and
GraphicsEnvironment, with the exception of fonts,
imaging, and printing, are changed to throw
HeadlessException if a display, keyboard, and mouse
are not supported. All the javadoc tags on these methods are
changed to reflect this RuntimeException.
Other methods that may be affected by lack of display,
keyboard, or mouse support, are changed to throw
HeadlessException.
It should be worth noting that the
HeadlessException is thrown if and only if
isHeadless returns true, and that all javadoc comments
should specify this.
(*)Applet, Button,
Checkbox, Choice,
FileDialog, Label, List,
Menu, MenuBar,
MenuComponent, MenuItem,
PopupMenu, Scrollbar,
ScrollPane, TextArea,
TextComponent, Frame,
Window, Dialog, JApplet,
JFrame, JWindow, JDialog,
and TextField. Canvas and
Panel do not need to throw this exception since these
can be given empty peers and treated as lightweights.
To run our environment with a headless implementation, the
follow property may be specified at the java command
line:
-Djava.awt.headless=true
If this property is not specified and a display, keyboard, and
mouse are not supported, then headless implementation is used by
default.
Source code should check for headless, so that the exception may
be caught gracefully. For example, see the following pre-headless
implementation of the class Foo:
class Foo {
static Choice c = new Choice(); // could throw HeadlessException
}
The new and improved implementation of Foo should be
placed in a static block:
class Foo {
static Choice c;
static {
try {
c = new Choice();
catch (HeadlessException e) {
...
}
}
}
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4189326.
The new full-screen exclusive mode API supports high performance
graphics by suspending the windowing system so that drawing can be
done directly to the screen. Full screen mode, which is entirely
different from simply taking an AWT Frame,
Window, or Dialog and expanding it to fit
the screen, is a graphics mode whereby the application takes entire
control over the contents of video memory. The application tells
the graphics card what to draw, how to draw it, and when to draw
it. This mode is not always available. On some operating systems,
it may not be implemented at all. On other operating systems, it
may only be available if the capability is supported by the
graphics card. Nevertheless, this mode is critical for performance
and is necessary for enabling hardware page-flipping on
Windows.
For a tutorial explaining how to use the full screen exclusive
API mode with several code examples, see here.
An application programmer can create and use a buffer strategy
from a Canvas or a Window. There are two
buffer strategies that are supported as protected inner classes:
java.awt.Component.FlipBufferStrategy
and java.awt.Component.BltBufferStrategy.
One of these two inner classes is used on the Canvas or
Window
when the createBufferStrategy method is called,
depending on the BufferCapabilities object supplied
when creating the strategy (if any). To get the buffer strategy
used by a particular component, the getBufferStrategy
method is used.
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4452207.
If you have a Dell Optiplex GX110 using an Intel 810 Graphics
Controller, under Windows NT, you may get a "sync out of range"
message from the video driver if you change the display mode more
than once and use a high display resolution. There is evidently a
bug in the (DirectX) video driver that is causing this. There are
several workarounds to this problem:
Disable DirectDraw by using
-Dsun.java2d.noddraw=true at the command line.
Do not change the display resolution more than once during the
lifetime of a program that is intended to run on this
hardware.
Disallow the following display modes on this hardware:
1152 X 864 8 85
1152 X 864 16 85
1152 X 864 24 85
1280 X 1024 8 70,72,75,85
1280 X 1024 16 70,72,75,85
1280 X 1024 24 70,75,85
Bad Color (Unsatisfactory appearance in terms of color)
1024 X 768 8 60,70,72,75,85
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4038769.
For certain applications having no native frame decorations
makes sense. For example, applications that will run across many
platforms and that require that the look and feel is the same, or
when the programmer does not want the end-user coming in contact
with the native operating system.
This release allows a Java application to turn off the creation
of frame decorations; no native titlebar, system menu, border, or
other native operating system dependent screen components appear
when this mode is enabled. AWT and Swing components work
transparently.
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4289845.
The mouse wheel, with a scroll wheel in place of the middle
mouse button, is enabled with new built-in Java support for
scrolling via the mouse wheel. The java.awt.event.MouseWheelEvent
class enables seamless support for mouse wheel scrolling in Java
applications with no recompiling required. Also, a new java.awt.event.MouseWheelListener
interface allows customization of mouse wheel behavior.
Note, for those using the mouse wheel on Linux, see here.
Scrolling Behavior:
A scrollbar is considered "scrollable" if it is both showing
and there is more content in the scrolling
Component than can be displayed at once, such that the
scroll thumb does not occupy the entire scroll track.
It is possible for a scrollbar to be showing, but not be
scrollable. Usually this occurs when a scrollbar is set to always
be displayed.
The scrollbar to be scrolled by the mouse wheel is determined
as follows:
If only one scrollbar is scrollable, it will be scrolled.
If both a horizontal and a vertical scrollbar are scrollable,
the vertical scrollbar will be scrolled.
Wheel scrolling may be disabled altogether using
setWheelScrollEnabled(false).
Up/away-from-user rotations cause vertical scroll bars to
scroll upwards, and horizontal scrollbars to scroll to the left.
Just the opposite is true for down/towards rotations.
No scrolling takes place if a scroll thumb is at the end of the
scroll track.
Heavyweight support:
Some native peers with integrated scroll bars can handle mouse
wheel scrolling by themselves. Examples on Windows includes
TextArea, Choice,
FileDialog, and List. Such components
will let their native peers handle wheel scrolling.
Components which do not inherit any native mouse
wheel behavior will propagate mouse wheel events up the
Container hierarchy until a Container
with MouseWheelEvents enabled is found. This is
typically a ScrollPane. Mouse wheel events are
delivered to the Component with
MouseWheelEvents enabled.
Alternatively, client programmers may add
MouseWheelListeners to customize what happens when the
mouse wheel is moved while the mouse is over a
Component. In the case of Components that
already have native handling of mouse wheel events, clients may
consume the mouse wheel event to avoid native handling.
java.awt.ScrollPane is modified to have
MouseWheelEvents enabled by default. When a
ScrollPane receives a MouseWheelEvent, it
will properly scroll its contained Component. This
functionality may be disabled with the new
setWheelScrollingEnabled method.
Lightweight Support:
Lightweight components will deliver mouse wheel events to their
first ancestor with a MouseWheelListener.
MouseWheelListeners may be added to any
JComponent for custom event handling.
javax.swing.JScrollPane is modified to properly
scroll its viewed component. Like java.awt.ScrollPane,
this may be disabled using
setWheelScrollingEnabled.
New API:
In addition to the new class and new interface previously
mentioned, there are some other changes to the API to support the
mouse wheel.
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4077991.
Previously, dynamic window resizing wasn't supported on all
platforms. For example, on Windows NT, with solid resize on,
resizing a window recalculated the layout only when the drag was
finished. This has been fixed in this release with the addition of
the new desktop property awt.dynamicLayoutSupported.
When dynamic layout is enabled, a Container
continually lays out its components as it resizes. If disabled, the
layout will be validated after resizing has finished.
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4290704.
Previously all of the state in an AWT component that could be
written could also be read. For example, there are no write-only
properties in the component API. Event listeners were a notable
exception. AWT event listeners are managed according to the
JavaBeansTM conventions with a
pair of methods: addXXXListener and
removeXXXListener for a listener that
implements the XXXEventListener interface.
No access was provided to the listener lists themselves. The
fields that contain the listener lists are package private and no
method was provided that returns the contents of a listener list.
This has caused some problems for Swing and other AWT clients.
To mitigate the problem in the Java 2 SDK, v1.3 release, we
added a getListeners method to Component
and to the Swing classes that defined listener lists. The
getListeners method uses a class to specify a
particular listener list. For example to get all of the listeners
added with addFocusListener, one would write:
getListeners(FocusListener.class).
This particular approach to exposing listener lists was taken to
minimize the overall change to the AWT/Swing public API. It was not
intended to be a convention for all JavaBeans and it did not handle
PropertyChangeListeners - which can be added to a
single property, as in
addPropertyChangeListener("myProperty", myListener).
For this release, we have designed a more complete solution to
accessing event listeners. The two conceptual changes are:
The addition of a getFooListeners method to the
add/remove convention in AWT and Swing classes.
Support for PropertyChangeListeners and
VetoableChangeListeners, including those which listen
to a single property, using the new java.util.EventListenerProxy
class.
The bugtraq reports that corresponds to this change are:
4407057 and
4426750.
In the Solaris and Linux releases of Java 2 Standard Edition,
SDK 1.3, several of the AWT heavyweight Components
exhibited default drag behavior via the middle mouse button, even
if the application did not identify these Components
as DragSources via the java.awt.dnd API.
These Components were implemented using Motif peers,
and Motif provides middle button drag behavior for these peers by
default.
Because of the design of the AWT, and because of bugs in the
Motif library, this default behavior has been the source of
numerous stability problems. Rather than continue to risk the
stability of AWT and Drag & Drop for a niche feature, we have
chosen to disable this feature explicitly in our
implementations.
Developers can still identify these Components as
DragSources in their applications using the
java.awt.dnd API. This is both functional and
supported. This approach is superior to relying upon default Motif
behavior in any case, because it enables drag support for these
Components on all platforms, not just Solaris and
Linux.
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4295833.
64-bit Solaris applications use 64 bits to address memory
instead of 32. This allows larger applications by providing a much
larger virtual memory space. For this release, AWT has been brought
up to 64-bit compliance. For more information, see here.
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4414004.
If you have installed English VC++ 6.0 onto a machine that also
has Asian Windows NT installed, you may encounter strange artifacts
when rendering Asian text in the TextArea component.
You may also see this problem if you have installed Microsoft
Exchange or Microsoft Office 97 onto a machine running Asian
Windows NT 4.0. Although this problem was reported on the Japanese
version of Windows NT, it will probably occur on other non-Latin
versions of NT as well, such as Chinese or Korean.
The problem was caused when the installation of those programs
replaced the Asian Riched32.dll with the English version. The
problem can be corrected by replacing Riched32.dll with the Asian
version.
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4293646.
The sun.awt.DrawingSurface API has been removed. It
was never made public, but some developers have been using it. The
functionality has been replaced by the JAWT. For more information,
see the AWT Native
Interface description.
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4463949.
Xinerama-aware applications running on multi-headed systems have
caused problems which have resulted in a variety of bug reports.
Some multi-headed environments use monitors with little or no
borders, which can be butted up against one another such that the
resulting effect is one mammoth display. In this case, a "properly"
centered window may span multiple screens. Other multi-headed
environments use regular CRT monitors, with several inches of
packaging between the actual display areas. In this case, a window
spanning multiple screens produces a disconcerting effect,
especially if the window cannot be dragged onto one monitor or the
other (the Solaris login screen, for example). In short there was
no way to tell where to center a window in a Xinerama
environment.
To address this problem, the X group has added API which allows
Xinerama users to specify where they want "centered" windows to be
centered, and allows developers of Xinerama-aware applications to
code accordingly.
Prior to this release, the way to center a window has been to
center it within the bounds of the default
GraphicsDevice, like this:
This code would center the windows "correctly" on Xinerama systems
where windows should be centered to the entire Xinerama coordinate
space.
As of this release, post
4356756-fix JDKs will center windows "correctly" on Xinerama
systems where windows should be centered within the first
display.
This method works as follows on various platforms:
Microsoft Windows/Macintosh:
These platforms include all monitors in a single virtual coordinate
space. However, there is one "primary" display (on Microsoft
Windows the primary display contains the task bar, on the Mac, the
menubar). Here, getCenterPoint returns the coordinates
of the center of the primary display.
X-Window, non-Xinerama
Each display has its own coordinate system; the upper-left corner
of every display is 0.0. Again, there is a "first" display. Here,
getCenterPoint returns the center point of the primary
display.
X-Window, Xinerama
All monitors share a single virtual coordinate space, as on
Microsoft Windows. However, it is possible for the user to specify
through X resources where windows should be centered. If these
resources are set, getCenterPoint reflects their
value. Otherwise, it returns the point at the center of the virtual
coordinate space. (In practice, this will almost always be set -
CDE sets it by default.)
As of JDK 1.4, the correct code for centering is:
frame.setLocation(getCenterPoint() - size of window / 2);
The other method added to GraphicsEnvironment is
getMaximumWindowBounds. Both
getCenterPoint and getMaximumWindowBounds
throw a HeadlessException when in Headless mode.
The bugtraq reports that corresponds to this change are:
4387938 and
4421515.
Previously, the InputEvent
modifiers had the same values for keyboard and mouse buttons. In
certain situations there was no way to distinguish which one was
pressed or when more than one was held simultaneously. These
situations included cases when more than one mouse button was down
at the same time, or when a modifier key was used to modify a mouse
event.
To address this deficiency, the following constants were added
to InputEvent:
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4462677.
The Choice drop down menu behavior has changed from
JDK 1.3.1 to 1.4. In 1.3.1, you could click anywhere on the choice
bar and the menu would drop down. In 1.4, you must click on the
arrow selector on the right hand side of the Choice
bar. Clicking anywhere else on the Choice bar has no
effect. Also, the symbol on the Choice bar has changed
from a bar to an arrow/bar combination. Finally, if the drop down
menu extends outside of the parent, when clicking on that area, the
application underneath is brought to the foreground. This happens
on Solaris, not Windows.
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4288285.
In releases prior to 1.4, the AWT Choice widget
sometimes ignored the size that the layout manager told it to be.
As of this release, it now obeys the layout manager
constraints.
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4476300.
The new focus subsystem, introduced in this release, introduced
a new architecture and a new terminology for handling keyboard
focus in sophisticated AWT and Swing applications. Prior to this
project, many of the focus-related APIs were inconsistent in usage
and termonology, were improperly documented, and led to poorly
designed UIs. Now that the new architecture is in place, the most
egregious of these APIs has been deprecated.
The following constants and methods have been deprecated:
The bugtraq report that corresponds to this change is:
4434193.
The new focus architecture includes a type-ahead mechanism that
ensures that subsequent KeyEvents that follow a
KeyEvent that initiates a focus transfer are not
delivered until the transfer is completed. The design for this
feature is based on the UTC timestamps of the various events.
Events with timestamps later than that of the initiating event are
enqueued pending resolution of the transfer; events with earlier
timestamps are not.
To implement this feature, the focus code keeps track of the
timestamp of the event currently being handled. If a focus change
is initiated during this handling, the timestamp is available for
use. However, if the current event does not have a timestamp, then
the current system time is used. This time is usually too far ahead
of the time that the event actually occurred to be of any real use.
As a result, the type-ahead mechanism fails, and
KeyEvents are delivered before the focus transfer is
completed.
The most common case where we encountered this problem was with
ActionEvents. ActionEvents are
high-level, semantic events generated in response to underlying
InputEvents. While the InputEvents had
timestamps associated with them, the ActionEvents did
not. The ActionEvent API has therefore been expanded
to accomodate a timestamp and the implementation has been updated
so that an ActionEvent's timestamp is equal to that of
its underlying InputEvent.
The following methods have been added to ActionEvent: