Spec-Zone .ru
спецификации, руководства, описания, API
Spec-Zone .ru
спецификации, руководства, описания, API
Библиотека разработчика Mac Разработчик
Поиск

 

Эта страница руководства для  версии 10.9 Mac OS X

Если Вы выполняете различную версию  Mac OS X, просматриваете документацию локально:

Читать страницы руководства

Страницы руководства предназначаются как справочник для людей, уже понимающих технологию.

  • Чтобы изучить, как руководство организовано или узнать о синтаксисе команды, прочитайте страницу руководства для страниц справочника (5).

  • Для получения дополнительной информации об этой технологии, ищите другую документацию в Библиотеке Разработчика Apple.

  • Для получения общей информации о записи сценариев оболочки, считайте Shell, Пишущий сценарий Учебника для начинающих.



SLAPD-SQL(5)                                                                                    SLAPD-SQL(5)



NAME
       slapd-sql - SQL backend to slapd

SYNOPSIS
       /etc/openldap/slapd.conf

DESCRIPTION
       The  primary  purpose  of  this slapd(8) backend is to PRESENT information stored in some RDBMS as an
       LDAP subtree without any programming (some SQL and maybe stored procedures can't be  considered  pro-gramming, programming,
       gramming, anyway ;).

       That  is,  for example, when you (some ISP) have account information you use in an RDBMS, and want to
       use modern solutions that expect such information in LDAP (to authenticate users, make email  lookups
       etc.).   Or  you  want  to synchronize or distribute information between different sites/applications
       that use RDBMSes and/or LDAP.  Or whatever else...

       It is NOT designed as a general-purpose backend that uses RDBMS instead of BerkeleyDB (as  the  stan-dard standard
       dard  BDB backend does), though it can be used as such with several limitations.  You can take a look
       at http://www.openldap.org/faq/index.cgi?file=378 (OpenLDAP FAQ-O-Matic/General LDAP  FAQ/Directories
       vs. conventional databases) to find out more on this point.

       The  idea  (detailed below) is to use some meta-information to translate LDAP queries to SQL queries,
       leaving relational schema untouched, so that old applications can continue using it without any modi-fications. modifications.
       fications.   This allows SQL and LDAP applications to inter-operate without replication, and exchange
       data as needed.

       The SQL backend is designed to be tunable to virtually any relational schema without having to change
       source  (through  that meta-information mentioned).  Also, it uses ODBC to connect to RDBMSes, and is
       highly configurable for SQL dialects RDBMSes may use, so it may be used for integration and distribu-tion distribution
       tion of data on different RDBMSes, OSes, hosts etc., in other words, in highly heterogeneous environ-ment. environment.
       ment.

       This backend is experimental.

CONFIGURATION
       These slapd.conf options apply to the SQL backend database, which  means  that  they  must  follow  a
       "database  sql"  line  and  come before any subsequent "backend" or "database" lines.  Other database
       options not specific to this backend are described in the slapd.conf(5) manual page.

DATA SOURCE CONFIGURATION
       dbname <datasource name>
              The name of the ODBC datasource to use.

       dbhost <hostname>
       dbpasswd <password>
       dbuser <username>
              The three above options are generally unneeded, because this information  is  taken  from  the
              datasource  specified  by  the  dbname directive.  They allow to override datasource settings.
              Also, several RDBMS' drivers tend to require explicit passing of user/password, even if  those
              are given in datasource (Note: dbhost is currently ignored).

SCOPING CONFIGURATION
       These options specify SQL query templates for scoping searches.


       subtree_cond <SQL expression>
              Specifies  a where-clause template used to form a subtree search condition (dn="(.+,)?<dn>$").
              It may differ from one SQL dialect to another (see samples).  By default,  it  is  constructed
              based  on the knowledge about how to normalize DN values (e.g.  "<upper_func>(ldap_entries.dn)
              LIKE CONCAT('%',?)"); see upper_func, upper_needs_cast,  concat_pattern  and  strcast_func  in
              "HELPER CONFIGURATION" for details.


       children_cond <SQL expression>
              Specifies  a  where-clause  template used to form a children search condition (dn=".+,<dn>$").
              It may differ from one SQL dialect to another (see samples).  By default,  it  is  constructed
              based  on the knowledge about how to normalize DN values (e.g.  "<upper_func>(ldap_entries.dn)
              LIKE CONCAT('%,',?)"); see upper_func, upper_needs_cast, concat_pattern  and  strcast_func  in
              "HELPER CONFIGURATION" for details.


       use_subtree_shortcut { YES | no }
              Do  not use the subtree condition when the searchBase is the database suffix, and the scope is
              subtree; rather collect all entries.


STATEMENT CONFIGURATION
       These options specify SQL query templates for loading schema  mapping  meta-information,  adding  and
       deleting entries to ldap_entries, etc.  All these and subtree_cond should have the given default val-ues. values.
       ues.  For the current value it is recommended to look at the sources, or in the log output when slapd
       starts with "-d 5" or greater.  Note that the parameter number and order must not be changed.


       oc_query <SQL expression>
              The  query  that  is used to collect the objectClass mapping data from table ldap_oc_mappings;
              see "METAINFORMATION USED" for details.  The default is "SELECT id, name, keytbl, keycol, cre-ate_proc, create_proc,
              ate_proc, delete_proc, expect_return FROM ldap_oc_mappings".


       at_query <SQL expression>
              The  query  that  is  used to collect the attributeType mapping data from table ldap_attr_map-pings; ldap_attr_mappings;
              pings; see "METAINFORMATION USED"  for  details.   The  default  is  "SELECT  name,  sel_expr,
              from_tbls,  join_where,  add_proc, delete_proc, param_order, expect_return FROM ldap_attr_map-pings ldap_attr_mappings
              pings WHERE oc_map_id=?".


       id_query <SQL expression>
              The query that is used to map a DN to an entry in  table  ldap_entries;  see  "METAINFORMATION
              USED"  for details.  The default is "SELECT id,keyval,oc_map_id,dn FROM ldap_entries WHERE <DN
              match expr>", where <DN match expr> is constructed based on the knowledge about how to normal-ize normalize
              ize  DN  values  (e.g.  "dn=?"  if  no  means  to  uppercase strings are available; typically,
              "<upper_func>(dn)=?" is used);  see  upper_func,  upper_needs_cast,  concat_pattern  and  str-cast_func strcast_func
              cast_func in "HELPER CONFIGURATION" for details.


       insentry_stmt <SQL expression>
              The  statement  that is used to insert a new entry in table ldap_entries; see "METAINFORMATION
              USED" for details.  The default is "INSERT INTO ldap_entries (dn, oc_map_id,  parent,  keyval)
              VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)".


       delentry_stmt <SQL expression>
              The  statement  that is used to delete an existing entry from table ldap_entries; see "METAIN-FORMATION "METAINFORMATION
              FORMATION USED" for details.  The default is "DELETE FROM ldap_entries WHERE id=?".


       delobjclasses_stmt <SQL expression>
              The statement that is used to delete an existing entry's ID from  table  ldap_objclasses;  see
              "METAINFORMATION  USED"  for details.  The default is "DELETE FROM ldap_entry_objclasses WHERE
              entry_id=?".


HELPER CONFIGURATION
       These statements are used to modify the default behavior of the backend according to  issues  of  the
       dialect of the RDBMS.  The first options essentially refer to string and DN normalization when build-ing building
       ing filters.  LDAP normalization is more than upper- (or lower-)casing everything; however, as a rea-sonable reasonable
       sonable  trade-off, for case-sensitive RDBMSes the backend can be instructed to uppercase strings and
       DNs by providing the upper_func directive.  Some RDBMSes, to use functions on arbitrary  data  types,
       e.g.  string  constants,  requires  a cast, which is triggered by the upper_needs_cast directive.  If
       required, a string cast function can be provided  as  well,  by  using  the  strcast_func  directive.
       Finally,  a custom string concatenation pattern may be required; it is provided by the concat_pattern
       directive.


       upper_func <SQL function name>
              Specifies the name of a function that converts a given value to uppercase.  This is  used  for
              case  insensitive  matching  when  the  RDBMS  is  case sensitive.  It may differ from one SQL
              dialect to another (e.g. UCASE, UPPER or whatever; see samples).  By default,  none  is  used,
              i.e. strings are not uppercased, so matches may be case sensitive.


       upper_needs_cast { NO | yes }
              Set  this  directive  to  yes  if  upper_func  needs  an explicit cast when applied to literal
              strings.  A cast in the form CAST (<arg> AS VARCHAR(<max DN length>)) is used, where  <max  DN
              length> is builtin in back-sql; see macro BACKSQL_MAX_DN_LEN (currently 255; note that slapd's
              builtin limit, in macro SLAP_LDAPDN_MAXLEN, is set to 8192).  This  is  experimental  and  may
              change in future releases.


       strcast_func <SQL function name>
              Specifies  the  name  of  a  function  that converts a given value to a string for appropriate
              ordering.  This is used in "SELECT DISTINCT" statements for strongly typed RDBMSes with little
              implicit  casting (like PostgreSQL), when a literal string is specified.  This is experimental
              and may change in future releases.


       concat_pattern <pattern>
              This statement defines the pattern that is used to concatenate strings.  The pattern MUST con-tain contain
              tain  two  question marks, '?', that will be replaced by the two strings that must be concate-nated. concatenated.
              nated.  The default value is CONCAT(?,?); a form that is known to be highly portable (IBM db2,
              PostgreSQL)  is  ?||?, but an explicit cast may be required when operating on literal strings:
              CAST(?||? AS VARCHAR(<length>)).  On some RDBMSes (IBM db2, MSSQL) the form ?+?  is  known  to
              work  as  well.  Carefully check the documentation of your RDBMS or stay with the examples for
              supported ones.  This is experimental and may change in future releases.


       aliasing_keyword <string>
              Define the aliasing keyword.  Some RDBMSes use the word "AS" (the default), others  don't  use
              any.


       aliasing_quote <string>
              Define  the  quoting  char  of  the  aliasing  keyword.   Some  RDBMSes don't require any (the
              default), others may require single or double quotes.


       has_ldapinfo_dn_ru { NO | yes }
              Explicitly inform the backend whether the dn_ru column (DN  in  reverse  uppercased  form)  is
              present  in table ldap_entries.  Overrides automatic check (this is required, for instance, by
              PostgreSQL/unixODBC).  This is experimental and may change in future releases.


       fail_if_no_mapping { NO | yes }
              When set to yes it forces attribute write operations to fail if no appropriate mapping between
              LDAP  attributes  and  SQL data is available.  The default behavior is to ignore those changes
              that cannot be mapped.  It has no impact on objectClass mapping, i.e. if the structuralObject-Class structuralObjectClass
              Class  of  an entry cannot be mapped to SQL by looking up its name in ldap_oc_mappings, an add
              operation will fail regardless of the fail_if_no_mapping switch; see section  "METAINFORMATION
              USED" for details.  This is experimental and may change in future releases.


       allow_orphans { NO | yes }
              When set to yes orphaned entries (i.e. without the parent entry in the database) can be added.
              This option should be used with care, possibly in conjunction with some special  rule  on  the
              RDBMS side that dynamically creates the missing parent.


       baseObject [ <filename> ]
              Instructs  the  database to create and manage an in-memory baseObject entry instead of looking
              for one in the RDBMS.  If the (optional) <filename> argument is given, the entry is read  from
              that  file in LDIF(5) format; otherwise, an entry with objectClass extensibleObject is created
              based on the contents of the  RDN  of  the  baseObject.   This  is  particularly  useful  when
              ldap_entries  information  is  stored  in a view rather than in a table, and union is not sup-ported supported
              ported for views, so that the view can only specify one rule to compute  the  entry  structure
              for one objectClass.  This topic is discussed further in section "METAINFORMATION USED".  This
              is experimental and may change in future releases.


       create_needs_select { NO | yes }
              Instructs the database whether or not entry creation in table ldap_entries needs a  subsequent
              select  to collect the automatically assigned ID, instead of being returned by a stored proce-dure. procedure.
              dure.


       fetch_attrs <attrlist>
       fetch_all_attrs { NO | yes }
              The first statement allows to provide a list of attributes that  must  always  be  fetched  in
              addition  to  those  requested  by  any  specific operation, because they are required for the
              proper usage of the backend.  For instance, all attributes used in ACLs should be listed here.
              The  second  statement is a shortcut to require all attributes to be always loaded.  Note that
              the dynamically generated attributes, e.g. hasSubordinates, entryDN and  other  implementation
              dependent  attributes are NOT generated at this point, for consistency with the rest of slapd.
              This may change in the future.


       check_schema { YES | no }
              Instructs the database to check schema adherence of entries after  modifications,  and  struc-tural structural
              tural objectClass chain when entries are built.  By default it is set to yes.


       sqllayer <name> [...]
              Loads  the layer <name> onto a stack of helpers that are used to map DNs from LDAP to SQL rep-resentation representation
              resentation and vice-versa.  Subsequent args are passed to the  layer  configuration  routine.
              This  is  highly  experimental and should be used with extreme care.  The API of the layers is
              not frozen yet, so it is unpublished.


       autocommit { NO | yes }
              Activates autocommit; by default, it is off.


METAINFORMATION USED
       Almost   everything   mentioned   later   is    illustrated    in    examples    located    in    the
       servers/slapd/back-sql/rdbms_depend/  directory in the OpenLDAP source tree, and contains scripts for
       generating sample database for Oracle, MS SQL Server, mySQL and more (including  PostgreSQL  and  IBM
       db2).

       The  first  thing  that  one  must  arrange is what set of LDAP object classes can present your RDBMS
       information.

       The easiest way is to create an objectClass for each entity you had in ER-diagram when designing your
       relational  schema.   Any  relational schema, no matter how normalized it is, was designed after some
       model of your application's domain (for instance, accounts, services etc. in ISP),  and  is  used  in
       terms  of  its  entities, not just tables of normalized schema.  It means that for every attribute of
       every such instance there is an effective SQL query that loads its values.

       Also you might want your object classes to conform to some of the standard schemas like inetOrgPerson
       etc.

       Nevertheless,  when you think it out, we must define a way to translate LDAP operation requests to (a
       series of) SQL queries.  Let us deal with the SEARCH operation.

       Example: Let's suppose that we store information about persons working in  our  organization  in  two
       tables:

         PERSONS              PHONES
         ----------           -------------id ------------id
         id integer           id integer
         first_name varchar   pers_id integer references persons(id)
         last_name varchar    phone
         middle_name varchar
         ...

       (PHONES contains telephone numbers associated with persons).  A person can have several numbers, then
       PHONES contains several records with corresponding pers_id, or no numbers (and no records  in  PHONES
       with such pers_id).  An LDAP objectclass to present such information could look like this:

         person
         -------MUST ------MUST
         MUST cn
         MAY telephoneNumber $ firstName $ lastName
         ...

       To fetch all values for cn attribute given person ID, we construct the query:

         SELECT CONCAT(persons.first_name,' ',persons.last_name)
             AS cn FROM persons WHERE persons.id=?

       for telephoneNumber we can use:

         SELECT phones.phone AS telephoneNumber FROM persons,phones
             WHERE persons.id=phones.pers_id AND persons.id=?

       If  we  wanted  to service LDAP requests with filters like (telephoneNumber=123*), we would construct
       something like:

         SELECT ... FROM persons,phones
             WHERE persons.id=phones.pers_id
                 AND persons.id=?
                 AND phones.phone like '%1%2%3%'

       (note how the telephoneNumber match is expanded in multiple wildcards  to  account  for  interspersed
       ininfluential  chars  like  spaces,  dashes  and so; this occurs by design because telephoneNumber is
       defined after a specially recognized syntax).  So, if we had information about  what  tables  contain
       values  for  each attribute, how to join these tables and arrange these values, we could try to auto-matically automatically
       matically generate such statements, and translate search filters to SQL WHERE clauses.

       To store such information, we add three more tables to our schema and fill it  with  data  (see  sam-ples): samples):
       ples):

         ldap_oc_mappings (some columns are not listed for clarity)
         ---------------id=1 --------------id=1
         id=1
         name="person"
         keytbl="persons"
         keycol="id"

       This  table  defines  a mapping between objectclass (its name held in the "name" column), and a table
       that holds the primary key for corresponding entities.  For instance,  in  our  example,  the  person
       entity,  which  we  are trying to present as "person" objectclass, resides in two tables (persons and
       phones), and is identified by the persons.id column (that we will  call  the  primary  key  for  this
       entity).   Keytbl  and  keycol thus contain "persons" (name of the table), and "id" (name of the col-umn). column).
       umn).

         ldap_attr_mappings (some columns are not listed for clarity)
         -----------id=1 ----------id=1
         id=1
         oc_map_id=1
         name="cn"
         sel_expr="CONCAT(persons.first_name,' ',persons.last_name)"
         from_tbls="persons"
         join_where=NULL
         ************
         id=<n>
         oc_map_id=1
         name="telephoneNumber"
         sel_expr="phones.phone"
         from_tbls="persons,phones"
         join_where="phones.pers_id=persons.id"

       This table defines mappings between LDAP attributes and SQL queries that  load  their  values.   Note
       that, unlike LDAP schema, these are not attribute types - the attribute "cn" for "person" objectclass
       can have its values in different tables than "cn" for some other objectclass, so  attribute  mappings
       depend  on  objectclass  mappings  (unlike  attribute  types in LDAP schema, which are indifferent to
       objectclasses).  Thus, we have oc_map_id column with link to oc_mappings table.

       Now we cut the SQL query that loads values for a given attribute  into  3  parts.   First  goes  into
       sel_expr  column - this is the expression we had between SELECT and FROM keywords, which defines WHAT
       to load.  Next is table list - text between FROM and WHERE keywords.  It may contain aliases for con-venience convenience
       venience (see examples).  The last is part of the where clause, which (if it exists at all) expresses
       the condition for joining the table containing values with the table containing the primary key (for-eign (foreign
       eign key equality and such).  If values are in the same table as the primary key, then this column is
       left NULL (as for cn attribute above).

       Having this information in parts, we are able to not only construct queries that load attribute  val-ues values
       ues by id of entry (for this we could store SQL query as a whole), but to construct queries that load
       id's of objects that correspond to a given search filter (or at least part of  it).   See  below  for
       examples.

         ldap_entries
         ------------id=1 -----------id=1
         id=1
         dn=<dn you choose>
         oc_map_id=...
         parent=<parent record id>
         keyval=<value of primary key>

       This  table defines mappings between DNs of entries in your LDAP tree, and values of primary keys for
       corresponding relational data.  It has recursive structure (parent column references id column of the
       same  table),  which allows you to add any tree structure(s) to your flat relational data.  Having id
       of objectclass mapping, we can determine table and column for primary key, and keyval stores value of
       it, thus defining the exact tuple corresponding to the LDAP entry with this DN.

       Note that such design (see exact SQL table creation query) implies one important constraint - the key
       must be an integer.  But all that I know about well-designed schemas makes me  think  that  it's  not
       very  narrow  ;) If anyone needs support for different types for keys - he may want to write a patch,
       and submit it to OpenLDAP ITS, then I'll include it.

       Also, several users complained that they don't really need very structured trees, and they don't want
       to  update  one more table every time they add or delete an instance in the relational schema.  Those
       people can use a view instead of a real  table  for  ldap_entries,  something  like  this  (by  Robin
       Elfrink):

         CREATE VIEW ldap_entries (id, dn, oc_map_id, parent, keyval)
             AS
                 SELECT 0, UPPER('o=MyCompany,c=NL'),
                     3, 0, 'baseObject' FROM unixusers WHERE userid='root'
             UNION
                 SELECT (1000000000+userid),
                     UPPER(CONCAT(CONCAT('cn=',gecos),',o=MyCompany,c=NL')),
                     1, 0, userid FROM unixusers
             UNION
                 SELECT (2000000000+groupnummer),
                     UPPER(CONCAT(CONCAT('cn=',groupnaam),',o=MyCompany,c=NL')),
                     2, 0, groupnummer FROM groups;


       If  your  RDBMS does not support unions in views, only one objectClass can be mapped in ldap_entries,
       and the baseObject cannot be created; in this case, see the baseObject directive for a possible work-around. workaround.
       around.



TYPICAL SQL BACKEND OPERATION
       Having  meta-information loaded, the SQL backend uses these tables to determine a set of primary keys
       of candidates (depending on search scope and filter).  It tries to do it for each objectclass  regis-tered registered
       tered in ldap_objclasses.

       Example:  for our query with filter (telephoneNumber=123*) we would get the following query generated
       (which loads candidate IDs)

         SELECT ldap_entries.id,persons.id, 'person' AS objectClass,
                ldap_entries.dn AS dn
           FROM ldap_entries,persons,phones
          WHERE persons.id=ldap_entries.keyval
            AND ldap_entries.objclass=?
            AND ldap_entries.parent=?
            AND phones.pers_id=persons.id
            AND (phones.phone LIKE '%1%2%3%')

       (for ONELEVEL search) or "... AND dn=?" (for BASE search) or "... AND dn LIKE '%?'" (for SUBTREE)

       Then, for each candidate, we load the requested attributes using per-attribute queries like

         SELECT phones.phone AS telephoneNumber
           FROM persons,phones
          WHERE persons.id=? AND phones.pers_id=persons.id

       Then, we use test_filter() from the frontend API to test the entry for  a  full  LDAP  search  filter
       match  (since  we  cannot effectively make sense of SYNTAX of corresponding LDAP schema attribute, we
       translate the filter into the most relaxed SQL condition to filter candidates), and send  it  to  the
       user.

       ADD,  DELETE,  MODIFY  and  MODRDN  operations  are  also performed on per-attribute meta-information
       (add_proc etc.).  In those fields one can specify an SQL statement or stored procedure call which can
       add,  or  delete  given  values  of  a given attribute, using the given entry keyval (see examples --mostly -mostly
       mostly PostgreSQL, ORACLE and MSSQL - since as of this writing there are no stored procs in MySQL).

       We just add more columns to ldap_oc_mappings and ldap_attr_mappings, holding  statements  to  execute
       (like  create_proc,  add_proc,  del_proc etc.), and flags governing the order of parameters passed to
       those statements.  Please see samples to find out what are the parameters passed, and other  informa-tion information
       tion on this matter - they are self-explanatory for those familiar with the concepts expressed above.


COMMON TECHNIQUES
       First of all, let's recall that among other major differences to the complete LDAP  data  model,  the
       above  illustrated  concept  does  not  directly  support such features as multiple objectclasses per
       entry, and referrals.  Fortunately, they are easy to adopt in this scheme.  The SQL backend  requires
       that one more table is added to the schema: ldap_entry_objectclasses(entry_id,oc_name).

       That table contains any number of objectclass names that corresponding entries will possess, in addi-tion addition
       tion to that mentioned in mapping.  The SQL backend automatically  adds  attribute  mapping  for  the
       "objectclass"  attribute to each objectclass mapping that loads values from this table.  So, you may,
       for instance, have a mapping for inetOrgPerson, and use it for queries for "person" objectclass...

       Referrals used to be implemented in a loose manner by adding an extra table that allowed any entry to
       host a "ref" attribute, along with a "referral" extra objectClass in table ldap_entry_objclasses.  In
       the current implementation, referrals are treated like any other user-defined schema,  since  "refer-ral" "referral"
       ral"  is  a  structural  objectclass.   The  suggested  practice  is  to define a "referral" entry in
       ldap_oc_mappings, holding a naming attribute, e.g. "ou" or "cn", a "ref"  attribute,  containing  the
       url; in case multiple referrals per entry are needed, a separate table for urls can be created, where
       urls are mapped to the respective entries.  The use of the naming attribute usually requires  to  add
       an "extensibleObject" value to ldap_entry_objclasses.



CAVEATS
       As previously stated, this backend should not be considered a replacement of other data storage back-ends, backends,
       ends, but rather a gateway to existing RDBMS storages that need to be published in LDAP form.

       The hasSubordintes operational attribute is honored by back-sql in  search  results  and  in  compare
       operations;  it is partially honored also in filtering.  Owing to design limitations, a (brain-dead?)
       filter of the form (!(hasSubordinates=TRUE)) will give no results instead of returning all  the  leaf
       entries,  because  it  actually  expands  into  ...  AND NOT (1=1).  If you need to find all the leaf
       entries, please use (hasSubordinates=FALSE) instead.

       A directoryString value of the form "__First___Last_" (where  underscores  mean  spaces,  ASCII  0x20
       char)  corresponds to its prettified counterpart "First_Last"; this is not currently honored by back-sql backsql
       sql if non-prettified data is written via RDBMS; when non-prettified data is  written  through  back-sql, backsql,
       sql, the prettified values are actually used instead.



BUGS
       When  the  ldap_entry_objclasses  table  is  empty,  filters on the objectClass attribute erroneously
       result in no candidates.  A workaround consists in adding at least one row to that table,  no  matter
       if valid or not.



PROXY CACHE OVERLAY
       The  proxy  cache  overlay allows caching of LDAP search requests (queries) in a local database.  See
       slapo-pcache(5) for details.

EXAMPLES
       There are example SQL modules in the slapd/back-sql/rdbms_depend/ directory in  the  OpenLDAP  source
       tree.

ACCESS CONTROL
       The  sql  backend honors access control semantics as indicated in slapd.access(5) (including the dis-close disclose
       close access privilege when enabled at compile time).

FILES
       /etc/openldap/slapd.conf
              default slapd configuration file

SEE ALSO
       slapd.conf(5), slapd(8).



OpenLDAP 2.4.28                                  2011/11/24                                     SLAPD-SQL(5)

Сообщение о проблемах

Способ сообщить о проблеме с этой страницей руководства зависит от типа проблемы:

Ошибки содержания
Ошибки отчета в содержании этой документации со ссылками на отзыв ниже.
Отчеты об ошибках
Сообщите об ошибках в функциональности описанного инструмента или API через Генератор отчетов Ошибки.
Форматирование проблем
Отчет, форматирующий ошибки в интерактивной версии этих страниц со ссылками на отзыв ниже.