Spec-Zone .ru
спецификации, руководства, описания, API
|
The EXPLAIN
statement provides information about the execution plan for a SELECT
statement.
EXPLAIN
returns a row of information for each table used in the SELECT
statement. It lists the tables in the output in the order that MySQL would
read them while processing the statement. MySQL resolves all joins using a nested-loop join method. This means
that MySQL reads a row from the first table, and then finds a matching row in the second table, the third table,
and so on. When all tables are processed, MySQL outputs the selected columns and backtracks through the table
list until a table is found for which there are more matching rows. The next row is read from this table and the
process continues with the next table.
When the EXTENDED
keyword is used, EXPLAIN
produces extra information that can be viewed by issuing a SHOW WARNINGS
statement following the EXPLAIN
statement. EXPLAIN EXTENDED
also displays the filtered
column.
See Section
8.8.3, "EXPLAIN EXTENDED
Output Format".
You cannot use the EXTENDED
and PARTITIONS
keywords together in the same EXPLAIN
statement.
EXPLAIN
Output Columns This section describes the output columns produced by EXPLAIN
.
Later sections provide additional information about the type
and Extra
columns.
Each output row from EXPLAIN
provides information about one table. Each row contains the values
summarized in Table 8.1, "EXPLAIN
Output Columns", and described in more detail following the table.
Table 8.1. EXPLAIN
Output Columns
Column | Meaning |
---|---|
id
|
The SELECT identifier |
select_type
|
The SELECT type |
table |
The table for the output row |
partitions
|
The matching partitions |
type |
The join type |
possible_keys |
The possible indexes to choose |
key |
The index actually chosen |
key_len
|
The length of the chosen key |
ref |
The columns compared to the index |
rows |
Estimate of rows to be examined |
filtered
|
Percentage of rows filtered by table condition |
Extra |
Additional information |
The SELECT
identifier. This is the sequential number of the SELECT
within the query. The value can be NULL
if the row refers to the union
result of other rows. In this case, the table
column shows a value like
<union
to indicate that the row refers to the
union of the rows with M
,N
>id
values of M
and N
.
The type of SELECT
, which can be any of those shown in the following table.
select_type Value |
Meaning |
---|---|
SIMPLE |
Simple SELECT (not using UNION or subqueries)
|
PRIMARY |
Outermost SELECT |
UNION |
Second or later SELECT
statement in a UNION
|
DEPENDENT UNION |
Second or later SELECT
statement in a UNION ,
dependent on outer query
|
UNION RESULT |
Result of a UNION .
|
SUBQUERY |
First SELECT in subquery
|
DEPENDENT SUBQUERY |
First SELECT in subquery, dependent on outer query
|
DERIVED |
Derived table SELECT
(subquery in FROM clause)
|
MATERIALIZED |
Materialized subquery |
UNCACHEABLE SUBQUERY |
A subquery for which the result cannot be cached and must be re-evaluated for each row of the outer query |
UNCACHEABLE UNION |
The second or later select in a UNION
that belongs to an uncacheable subquery (seeUNCACHEABLE
SUBQUERY )
|
DEPENDENT
typically signifies the use of a correlated subquery. See Section 13.2.10.7, "Correlated Subqueries".
DEPENDENT SUBQUERY
evaluation differs from UNCACHEABLE
SUBQUERY
evaluation. For DEPENDENT SUBQUERY
, the subquery is
re-evaluated only once for each set of different values of the variables from its outer context. For
UNCACHEABLE SUBQUERY
, the subquery is re-evaluated for each row of the
outer context.
Cacheability of subqueries differs from caching of query results in the query cache (which is described in Section 8.9.3.1, "How the Query Cache Operates"). Subquery caching occurs during query execution, whereas the query cache is used to store results only after query execution finishes.
The name of the table to which the row of output refers. This can also be one of the following values:
<union
: The row refers to the union of the rows with M
,N
>
id
values of
M
and N
.
<derived
: The row refers to the derived table result for the row with an N
>
id
value of N
. A
derived table may result, for example, from a subquery in the FROM
clause.
<subquery
: The row refers to the result of a materialized subquery for the row with an N
>
id
value of N
. See Section
8.13.16.2, "Optimizing Subqueries with Subquery Materialization".
The partitions from which records would be matched by the query. This column is displayed only if
the PARTITIONS
keyword is used. The value is NULL
for nonpartitioned tables. See Section
18.3.5, "Obtaining Information About Partitions".
The join type. For descriptions of the different types, see EXPLAIN
Join Types.
The possible_keys
column indicates which indexes MySQL can choose from
use to find the rows in this table. Note that this column is totally independent of the order of the
tables as displayed in the output from EXPLAIN
.
That means that some of the keys in possible_keys
might not be usable
in practice with the generated table order.
If this column is NULL
, there are no relevant indexes. In this case,
you may be able to improve the performance of your query by examining the WHERE
clause to check whether it refers to some column or columns that would be suitable for indexing. If
so, create an appropriate index and check the query with EXPLAIN
again. See Section
13.1.7, "ALTER TABLE
Syntax".
To see what indexes a table has, use SHOW INDEX FROM
. tbl_name
The key
column indicates the key (index) that MySQL actually decided to
use. If MySQL decides to use one of the possible_keys
indexes to look
up rows, that index is listed as the key value.
It is possible that key
will name an index that is not present in the
possible_keys
value. This can happen if none of the possible_keys
indexes are suitable for looking up rows, but all the
columns selected by the query are columns of some other index. That is, the named index covers the
selected columns, so although it is not used to determine which rows to retrieve, an index scan is
more efficient than a data row scan.
For InnoDB
, a secondary index might cover the selected columns even if
the query also selects the primary key because InnoDB
stores the
primary key value with each secondary index. If key
is NULL
, MySQL found no index to use for executing the query more
efficiently.
To force MySQL to use or ignore an index listed in the possible_keys
column, use FORCE INDEX
, USE INDEX
, or
IGNORE INDEX
in your query. See Section
13.2.9.3, "Index Hint Syntax".
For MyISAM
and NDB
tables, running ANALYZE TABLE
helps the optimizer choose better indexes. For NDB
tables, this also improves performance of distributed pushed-down
joins. For MyISAM
tables, myisamchk --analyze does the same as ANALYZE TABLE
. See
Section 7.6, "MyISAM
Table Maintenance and Crash Recovery".
The key_len
column indicates the length of the key that MySQL decided
to use. The length is NULL
if the key
column says NULL
. Note that the value of key_len
enables you to determine how many parts of a multiple-part
key MySQL actually uses.
The ref
column shows which columns or constants are compared to the
index named in the key
column to select rows from the table.
The rows
column indicates the number of rows MySQL believes it must
examine to execute the query.
For InnoDB
tables, this
number is an estimate, and may not always be exact.
The filtered
column indicates an estimated percentage of table rows
that will be filtered by the table condition. That is, rows
shows the
estimated number of rows examined and rows
× filtered
/ 100
shows the number of rows that will be joined with previous
tables. This column is displayed if you use EXPLAIN EXTENDED
.
This column contains additional information about how MySQL resolves the query. For descriptions of
the different values, see EXPLAIN
Extra Information.
EXPLAIN
Join Types The type
column of EXPLAIN
output describes how tables are joined. The following list describes the
join types, ordered from the best type to the worst:
The table has only one row (= system table). This is a special case of the const
join type.
The table has at most one matching row, which is read at the start of the query. Because there is
only one row, values from the column in this row can be regarded as constants by the rest of the
optimizer. const
tables are very fast because they are read only once.
const
is
used when you compare all parts of a PRIMARY KEY
or UNIQUE
index to constant values. In the following queries, tbl_name
can be used as a const
table:
SELECT * FROMtbl_name
WHEREprimary_key
=1;SELECT * FROMtbl_name
WHEREprimary_key_part1
=1 ANDprimary_key_part2
=2;
One row is read from this table for each combination of rows from the previous tables. Other than
the system
and const
types, this is the best possible join type. It is used when all parts of an index are used by the
join and the index is a PRIMARY KEY
or UNIQUE NOT
NULL
index.
eq_ref
can
be used for indexed columns that are compared using the =
operator. The
comparison value can be a constant or an expression that uses columns from tables that are read
before this table. In the following examples, MySQL can use an eq_ref
join to process ref_table
:
SELECT * FROMref_table
,other_table
WHEREref_table
.key_column
=other_table
.column
;SELECT * FROMref_table
,other_table
WHEREref_table
.key_column_part1
=other_table
.column
ANDref_table
.key_column_part2
=1;
All rows with matching index values are read from this table for each combination of rows from the
previous tables. ref
is used if the join uses only a leftmost prefix of the key or
if the key is not a PRIMARY KEY
or UNIQUE
index (in other words, if the join cannot select a single row based on the key value). If the key
that is used matches only a few rows, this is a good join type.
ref
can be
used for indexed columns that are compared using the =
or <=>
operator. In the following examples, MySQL can use a ref
join
to process ref_table
:
SELECT * FROMref_table
WHEREkey_column
=expr
;SELECT * FROMref_table
,other_table
WHEREref_table
.key_column
=other_table
.column
;SELECT * FROMref_table
,other_table
WHEREref_table
.key_column_part1
=other_table
.column
ANDref_table
.key_column_part2
=1;
The join is performed using a FULLTEXT
index.
This join type is like ref
,
but with the addition that MySQL does an extra search for rows that contain NULL
values. This join type optimization is used most often in resolving subqueries. In the following
examples, MySQL can use a ref_or_null
join to process ref_table
:
SELECT * FROMref_table
WHEREkey_column
=expr
ORkey_column
IS NULL;
This join type indicates that the Index Merge optimization is used. In this case, the key
column in the output row contains a list of indexes used, and key_len
contains a list of the longest key parts for the indexes used.
For more information, see Section 8.13.2, "Index Merge
Optimization".
This type replaces ref
for some IN
subqueries of the
following form:
value
IN (SELECTprimary_key
FROMsingle_table
WHEREsome_expr
)
unique_subquery
is just an index lookup function that replaces the subquery completely for better efficiency.
This join type is similar to unique_subquery
. It replaces IN
subqueries, but it works for nonunique indexes in subqueries of the following form:
value
IN (SELECTkey_column
FROMsingle_table
WHEREsome_expr
)
Only rows that are in a given range are retrieved, using an index to select the rows. The key
column in the output row indicates which index is used. The key_len
contains the longest key part that was used. The ref
column is NULL
for this type.
range
can be
used when a key column is compared to a constant using any of the =
, <>
, >
, >=
, <
, <=
, IS NULL
, <=>
, BETWEEN
, or IN()
operators:
SELECT * FROMtbl_name
WHEREkey_column
= 10;SELECT * FROMtbl_name
WHEREkey_column
BETWEEN 10 and 20;SELECT * FROMtbl_name
WHEREkey_column
IN (10,20,30);SELECT * FROMtbl_name
WHEREkey_part1
= 10 ANDkey_part2
IN (10,20,30);
The index
join type is the same as ALL
,
except that the index tree is scanned. This occurs two ways:
If the index is a covering index for the queries and can be used to
satisfy all data required from the table, only the index tree is scanned. In this case, the
Extra
column says Using index
. An
index-only scan usually is faster than ALL
because the size of
the index usually is smaller than the table data.
A full table scan is performed using reads from the index to look up
data rows in index order. Uses index
does not appear in the
Extra
column.
MySQL can use this join type when the query uses only columns that are part of a single index.
A full table scan is done for each combination of rows from the previous tables. This is normally
not good if the table is the first table not marked const
, and usually very
bad in all other cases. Normally, you can avoid ALL
by adding indexes
that enable row retrieval from the table based on constant values or column values from earlier
tables.
EXPLAIN
Extra Information The Extra
column of EXPLAIN
output contains additional information about how MySQL resolves the
query. The following list explains the values that can appear in this column. If you want to make your queries
as fast as possible, look out for Extra
values of Using
filesort
and Using temporary
.
Child of '
table
'
pushed join@1
This table is referenced as the child of table
in a join
that can be pushed down to the NDB kernel. Applies only in MySQL Cluster, when pushed-down joins are
enabled. See the description of the ndb_join_pushdown
server system variable for more information and
examples.
const row not found
For a query such as SELECT ... FROM
, the table was empty. tbl_name
Deleting all rows
For DELETE
, some storage engines (such as MyISAM
) support a handler method that removes all table rows in a
simple and fast way. This Extra
value is displayed if the engine uses
this optimization.
Distinct
MySQL is looking for distinct values, so it stops searching for more rows for the current row combination after it has found the first matching row.
FirstMatch(
tbl_name
)
The semi-join FirstMatch join shortcutting strategy is used for tbl_name
.
Full scan on NULL key
This occurs for subquery optimization as a fallback strategy when the optimizer cannot use an index-lookup access method.
Impossible HAVING
The HAVING
clause is always false and cannot select any rows.
Impossible WHERE
The WHERE
clause is always false and cannot select any rows.
Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables
MySQL has read all const
(and system
) tables and notice that the WHERE
clause is always false.
LooseScan(
m
..n
)
The semi-join LooseScan strategy is used. m
and n
are key part numbers.
Materialize
, Scan
Before MySQL 5.6.7, this indicates use of a single materialized temporary table. If Scan
is present, no temporary table index is used for table reads.
Otherwise, an index lookup is used. See also the Start materialize
entry.
As of MySQL 5.6.7, materialization is indicated by rows with a select_type
value of MATERIALIZED
and rows
with a table
value of <subquery
. N
>
No matching min/max row
No row satisfies the condition for a query such as SELECT MIN(...) FROM ...
WHERE
. condition
no matching row in const table
For a query with a join, there was an empty table or a table with no rows satisfying a unique index condition.
No matching rows after partition pruning
For DELETE
or UPDATE
,
the optimizer found nothing to delete or update after partition pruning. It is similar in meaning to
Impossible WHERE
for SELECT
statements.
No tables used
The query has no FROM
clause, or has a FROM
DUAL
clause.
For INSERT
or REPLACE
statements, EXPLAIN
displays this value when there is no SELECT
part. For example, it appears for EXPLAIN
INSERT INTO t VALUES(10)
because that is equivalent to EXPLAIN
INSERT INTO t SELECT 10 FROM DUAL
.
Not exists
MySQL was able to do a LEFT JOIN
optimization on the query and does not
examine more rows in this table for the previous row combination after it finds one row that matches
the LEFT JOIN
criteria. Here is an example of the type of query that
can be optimized this way:
SELECT * FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 ON t1.id=t2.id WHERE t2.id IS NULL;
Assume that t2.id
is defined as NOT NULL
.
In this case, MySQL scans t1
and looks up the rows in t2
using the values of t1.id
. If MySQL
finds a matching row in t2
, it knows that t2.id
can never be NULL
, and does not
scan through the rest of the rows in t2
that have the same id
value. In other words, for each row in t1
, MySQL needs to do only a single lookup in t2
,
regardless of how many rows actually match in t2
.
Range checked for each record (index map:
N
)
MySQL found no good index to use, but found that some of indexes might be used after column values
from preceding tables are known. For each row combination in the preceding tables, MySQL checks
whether it is possible to use a range
or index_merge
access method to retrieve rows. This is not very
fast, but is faster than performing a join with no index at all. The applicability criteria are as
described in Section 8.13.1, "Range Optimization", and Section 8.13.2, "Index Merge Optimization",
with the exception that all column values for the preceding table are known and considered to be
constants.
Indexes are numbered beginning with 1, in the same order as shown by SHOW INDEX
for the table. The index map value N
is a bitmask value that indicates which indexes are
candidates. For example, a value of 0x19
(binary 11001) means that
indexes 1, 4, and 5 will be considered.
Scanned
N
databases
This indicates how many directory scans the server performs when processing a query for INFORMATION_SCHEMA
tables, as described in Section
8.2.4, "Optimizing INFORMATION_SCHEMA
Queries". The value of N
can be 0, 1, or all
.
Select tables optimized away
The query contained only aggregate functions (MIN()
, MAX()
) that were all resolved using an index, or COUNT(*)
for MyISAM
, and no GROUP BY
clause. The optimizer determined that only one row should be
returned.
Skip_open_table
, Open_frm_only
, Open_trigger_only
, Open_full_table
These values indicate file-opening optimizations that apply to queries for INFORMATION_SCHEMA
tables, as described in Section 8.2.4,
"Optimizing INFORMATION_SCHEMA
Queries".
Skip_open_table
: Table files do not need to
be opened. The information has already become available within the query by scanning the
database directory.
Open_frm_only
: Only the table's .frm
file need be opened.
Open_trigger_only
: Only the table's .TRG
file need be opened.
Open_full_table
: The unoptimized
information lookup. The .frm
, .MYD
, and .MYI
files must be
opened.
Start materialize
, End
materialize
, Scan
Before MySQL 5.6.7, this indicates use of multiple materialized temporary tables. If Scan
is present, no temporary table index is used for table reads.
Otherwise, an index lookup is used. See also the Materialize
entry.
As of MySQL 5.6.7, materialization is indicated by rows with a select_type
value of MATERIALIZED
and rows
with a table
value of <subquery
. N
>
Start temporary
, End
temporary
This indicates temporary table use for the semi-join Duplicate Weedout strategy.
unique row not found
For a query such as SELECT ... FROM
, no rows satisfy the condition for a tbl_name
UNIQUE
index or PRIMARY KEY
on the table.
Using filesort
MySQL must do an extra pass to find out how to retrieve the rows in sorted order. The sort is done
by going through all rows according to the join type and storing the sort key and pointer to the row
for all rows that match the WHERE
clause. The keys then are sorted and
the rows are retrieved in sorted order. See Section
8.13.13, "ORDER BY
Optimization".
Using index
The column information is retrieved from the table using only information in the index tree without having to do an additional seek to read the actual row. This strategy can be used when the query uses only columns that are part of a single index.
If the Extra
column also says Using where
,
it means the index is being used to perform lookups of key values. Without Using
where
, the optimizer may be reading the index to avoid reading data rows but not using it
for lookups. For example, if the index is a covering index for the query, the optimizer may scan it
without using it for lookups.
For InnoDB
tables that have a user-defined clustered index, that index
can be used even when Using index
is absent from the Extra
column. This is the case if type
is index
and key
is PRIMARY
.
Using index condition
Tables are read by accessing index tuples and testing them first to determine whether to read full table rows. In this way, index information is used to defer ("push down") reading full table rows unless it is necessary. See Section 8.13.4, "Index Condition Pushdown Optimization".
Using index for group-by
Similar to the Using index
table access method, Using
index for group-by
indicates that MySQL found an index that can be used to retrieve all
columns of a GROUP BY
or DISTINCT
query
without any extra disk access to the actual table. Additionally, the index is used in the most
efficient way so that for each group, only a few index entries are read. For details, see Section 8.13.14, "GROUP
BY
Optimization".
Using join buffer (Block Nested Loop)
, Using join buffer (Batched Key Access)
Tables from earlier joins are read in portions into the join buffer, and then their rows are used
from the buffer to perform the join with the current table. (Block Nested
Loop)
indicates use of the Block Nested-Loop algorithm and (Batched
Key Access)
indicates use of the Batched Key Access algorithm. That is, the keys from the
table on the preceding line of the EXPLAIN
output will be buffered, and the matching rows will be
fetched in batches from the table represented by the line in which Using join
buffer
appears.
Using MRR
Tables are read using the Multi-Range Read optimization strategy. See Section 8.13.11, "Multi-Range Read Optimization".
Using sort_union(...)
, Using
union(...)
, Using intersect(...)
These indicate how index scans are merged for the index_merge
join type. See Section
8.13.2, "Index Merge Optimization".
Using temporary
To resolve the query, MySQL needs to create a temporary table to hold the result. This typically
happens if the query contains GROUP BY
and ORDER
BY
clauses that list columns differently.
Using where
A WHERE
clause is used to restrict which rows to match against the next
table or send to the client. Unless you specifically intend to fetch or examine all rows from the
table, you may have something wrong in your query if the Extra
value is
not Using where
and the table join type is ALL
or index
.
Using where with pushed condition
This item applies to NDB
tables only. It means that
MySQL Cluster is using the Condition Pushdown optimization to improve the efficiency of a direct
comparison between a nonindexed column and a constant. In such cases, the condition is "pushed down" to the cluster's data nodes
and is evaluated on all data nodes simultaneously. This eliminates the need to send nonmatching rows
over the network, and can speed up such queries by a factor of 5 to 10 times over cases where
Condition Pushdown could be but is not used. For more information, see Section
8.13.3, "Engine Condition Pushdown Optimization".
EXPLAIN
Output Interpretation You can get a good indication of how good a join is by taking the product of the values in the rows
column of the EXPLAIN
output. This should tell you roughly how many rows MySQL must examine to
execute the query. If you restrict queries with the max_join_size
system variable, this row product also is used to determine
which multiple-table SELECT
statements to execute and which to abort. See Section
8.11.2, "Tuning Server Parameters".
The following example shows how a multiple-table join can be optimized progressively based on the information
provided by EXPLAIN
.
Suppose that you have the SELECT
statement shown here and that you plan to examine it using EXPLAIN
:
EXPLAIN SELECT tt.TicketNumber, tt.TimeIn, tt.ProjectReference, tt.EstimatedShipDate, tt.ActualShipDate, tt.ClientID, tt.ServiceCodes, tt.RepetitiveID, tt.CurrentProcess, tt.CurrentDPPerson, tt.RecordVolume, tt.DPPrinted, et.COUNTRY, et_1.COUNTRY, do.CUSTNAME FROM tt, et, et AS et_1, do WHERE tt.SubmitTime IS NULL AND tt.ActualPC = et.EMPLOYID AND tt.AssignedPC = et_1.EMPLOYID AND tt.ClientID = do.CUSTNMBR;
For this example, make the following assumptions:
The columns being compared have been declared as follows.
Table | Column | Data Type |
---|---|---|
tt |
ActualPC |
CHAR(10) |
tt |
AssignedPC |
CHAR(10) |
tt |
ClientID |
CHAR(10) |
et |
EMPLOYID |
CHAR(15) |
do |
CUSTNMBR |
CHAR(15) |
The tables have the following indexes.
Table | Index |
---|---|
tt |
ActualPC |
tt |
AssignedPC |
tt |
ClientID |
et |
EMPLOYID (primary key) |
do |
CUSTNMBR (primary key) |
The tt.ActualPC
values are not evenly distributed.
Initially, before any optimizations have been performed, the EXPLAIN
statement produces the following information:
table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extraet ALL PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 74do ALL PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 2135et_1 ALL PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 74tt ALL AssignedPC, NULL NULL NULL 3872 ClientID, ActualPC Range checked for each record (index map: 0x23)
Because type
is ALL
for each table, this output
indicates that MySQL is generating a Cartesian product of all the tables; that is, every combination of rows.
This takes quite a long time, because the product of the number of rows in each table must be examined. For the
case at hand, this product is 74 × 2135 × 74 × 3872 = 45,268,558,720 rows. If the tables were bigger, you can
only imagine how long it would take.
One problem here is that MySQL can use indexes on columns more efficiently if they are declared as the same type
and size. In this context, VARCHAR
and CHAR
are considered the same if they are declared as the same size. tt.ActualPC
is declared as CHAR(10)
and et.EMPLOYID
is CHAR(15)
, so there is a length
mismatch.
To fix this disparity between column lengths, use ALTER
TABLE
to lengthen ActualPC
from 10 characters to 15 characters:
mysql> ALTER TABLE tt MODIFY ActualPC
VARCHAR(15);
Now tt.ActualPC
and et.EMPLOYID
are both VARCHAR(15)
. Executing the EXPLAIN
statement again produces this result:
table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extratt ALL AssignedPC, NULL NULL NULL 3872 Using ClientID, where ActualPCdo ALL PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 2135 Range checked for each record (index map: 0x1)et_1 ALL PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 74 Range checked for each record (index map: 0x1)et eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 15 tt.ActualPC 1
This is not perfect, but is much better: The product of the rows
values is less by
a factor of 74. This version executes in a couple of seconds.
A second alteration can be made to eliminate the column length mismatches for the tt.AssignedPC
= et_1.EMPLOYID
and tt.ClientID = do.CUSTNMBR
comparisons:
mysql>ALTER TABLE tt MODIFY AssignedPC VARCHAR(15),
->MODIFY ClientID VARCHAR(15);
After that modification, EXPLAIN
produces the output shown here:
table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extraet ALL PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 74tt ref AssignedPC, ActualPC 15 et.EMPLOYID 52 Using ClientID, where ActualPCet_1 eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 15 tt.AssignedPC 1do eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 15 tt.ClientID 1
At this point, the query is optimized almost as well as possible. The remaining problem is that, by default,
MySQL assumes that values in the tt.ActualPC
column are evenly distributed, and
that is not the case for the tt
table. Fortunately, it is easy to tell MySQL to
analyze the key distribution:
mysql> ANALYZE TABLE tt;
With the additional index information, the join is perfect and EXPLAIN
produces this result:
table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extratt ALL AssignedPC NULL NULL NULL 3872 Using ClientID, where ActualPCet eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 15 tt.ActualPC 1et_1 eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 15 tt.AssignedPC 1do eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 15 tt.ClientID 1
Note that the rows
column in the output
from EXPLAIN
is an educated guess from the MySQL join optimizer. Check whether the
numbers are even close to the truth by comparing the rows
product with the actual
number of rows that the query returns. If the numbers are quite different, you might get better performance by
using STRAIGHT_JOIN
in your SELECT
statement and trying to list the tables in a different order in the FROM
clause.
It is possible in some cases to execute statements that modify data when EXPLAIN SELECT
is used with a subquery; for more information, see Section
13.2.10.8, "Subqueries in the FROM
Clause".