Spec-Zone .ru
спецификации, руководства, описания, API
|
Source and target tables for replication do not have to be identical. A table on the master can have more or fewer columns than the slave's copy of the table. In addition, corresponding table columns on the master and the slave can use different data types, subject to certain conditions.
In all cases where the source and target tables do not have identical definitions, the database and table names must be the same on both the master and the slave. Additional conditions are discussed, with examples, in the following two sections.
You can replicate a table from the master to the slave such that the master and slave copies of the table have differing numbers of columns, subject to the following conditions:
Columns common to both versions of the table must be defined in the same order on the master and the slave.
(This is true even if both tables have the same number of columns.)
Columns common to both versions of the table must be defined before any additional columns.
This means that executing an ALTER
TABLE
statement on the slave where a new column is inserted into the table within the
range of columns common to both tables causes replication to fail, as shown in the following
example:
Suppose that a table t
, existing on the master and the slave, is
defined by the following CREATE
TABLE
statement:
CREATE TABLE t ( c1 INT, c2 INT, c3 INT);
Suppose that the ALTER TABLE
statement shown here is executed on the slave:
ALTER TABLE t ADD COLUMN cnew1 INT AFTER c3;
The previous ALTER TABLE
is permitted on the slave because the columns c1
, c2
, and c3
that are common to both
versions of table t
remain grouped together in both versions of the
table, before any columns that differ.
However, the following ALTER
TABLE
statement cannot be executed on the slave without causing replication to break:
ALTER TABLE t ADD COLUMN cnew2 INT AFTER c2;
Replication fails after execution on the slave of the ALTER TABLE
statement just shown, because the new column cnew2
comes between columns common to both versions of t
.
Each "extra" column in the version of the table having more columns must have a default value.
A column's default value is determined by a number of factors, including its type, whether it is
defined with a DEFAULT
option, whether it is declared as NULL
, and the server SQL mode in effect at the time of its
creation; for more information, see Section 11.5,
"Data Type Default Values").
In addition, when the slave's copy of the table has more columns than the master's copy, each column common to the tables must use the same data type in both tables.
Examples. The following examples illustrate some valid and invalid table definitions:
More columns on the master. The following table definitions are valid and replicate correctly:
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT, c3 INT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT);
The following table definitions would raise Error 1532 (ER_BINLOG_ROW_RBR_TO_SBR
) because the definitions of the columns common to
both versions of the table are in a different order on the slave than they are on the master:
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT, c3 INT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c2 INT, c1 INT);
The following table definitions would also raise Error 1532 because the definition of the extra column on the master appears before the definitions of the columns common to both versions of the table:
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c3 INT, c1 INT, c2 INT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT);
More columns on the slave. The following table definitions are valid and replicate correctly:
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT, c3 INT);
The following definitions raise Error 1532 because the columns common to both versions of the table are not defined in the same order on both the master and the slave:
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c2 INT, c1 INT, c3 INT);
The following table definitions also raise Error 1532 because the definition for the extra column in the slave's version of the table appears before the definitions for the columns which are common to both versions of the table:
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c3 INT, c1 INT, c2 INT);
The following table definitions fail because the slave's version of the table has additional columns
compared to the master's version, and the two versions of the table use different data types for the common
column c2
:
master>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 BIGINT);
slave>CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT, c2 INT, c3 INT);
Corresponding columns on the master's and the slave's copies of the same table ideally should have the same data type. However, beginning with MySQL 5.1.21, this is not always strictly enforced, as long as certain conditions are met.
All other things being equal, it is always possible to replicate from a column of a given data type to
another column of the same type and same size or width, where applicable, or larger. For example, you can
replicate from a CHAR(10)
column to another CHAR(10)
, or from a CHAR(10)
column to a CHAR(25)
column without any problems. In certain cases, it also possible to
replicate from a column having one data type (on the master) to a column having a different data type (on
the slave); when the data type of the master's version of the column is promoted to a type that is the same
size or larger on the slave, this is known as attribute promotion.
Attribute promotion can be used with both statement-based and row-based replication, and is not dependent on the storage engine used by either the master or the slave. However, the choice of logging format does have an effect on the type conversions that are permitted; the particulars are discussed later in this section.
Whether you use statement-based or row-based replication, the slave's copy of the table cannot contain more columns than the master's copy if you wish to employ attribute promotion.
Statement-based replication. When using statement-based replication, a simple rule of thumb to follow
is, "If the statement run on the master would also execute successfully on the slave, it should also replicate successfully".
In other words, if the statement uses a value that is compatible with the type of a given column on the
slave, the statement can be replicated. For example, you can insert any value that fits in a TINYINT
column into a BIGINT
column as well; it
follows that, even if you change the type of a TINYINT
column in the slave's
copy of a table to BIGINT
, any insert into that column on the master that
succeeds should also succeed on the slave, since it is impossible to have a legal TINYINT
value that is large enough to exceed a BIGINT
column.
Prior to MySQL 5.6.10, when using statement-based replication, AUTO_INCREMENT
columns were required to be the same on both the master and the slave; otherwise, updates could be applied
to the wrong table on the slave. (Bug #12669186)
Row-based replication: attribute promotion and demotion. Row-based replication in MySQL 5.6 supports attribute promotion and demotion between smaller data types and larger types. It is also possible to specify whether or not to permit lossy (truncated) or non-lossy conversions of demoted column values, as explained later in this section.
Lossy and non-lossy conversions. In the event that the target type cannot represent the value being inserted, a decision must be made on how to handle the conversion. If we permit the conversion but truncate (or otherwise modify) the source value to achieve a "fit" in the target column, we make what is known as a lossy conversion. A conversion which does not require truncation or similar modifications to fit the source column value in the target column is a non-lossy conversion.
Type conversion modes (slave_type_conversions
variable). The setting of
the slave_type_conversions
global server variable controls the type conversion
mode used on the slave. This variable takes a set of values from the following table, which shows the
effects of each mode on the slave's type-conversion behavior:
Mode | Effect |
---|---|
ALL_LOSSY |
In this mode, type conversions that would mean loss of information are permitted. This does not imply that non-lossy conversions are permitted, merely that only cases
requiring either lossy conversions or no conversion at all are permitted; for example,
enabling only this mode permits an |
ALL_NON_LOSSY |
This mode permits conversions that do not require truncation or other special handling of the source value; that is, it permits conversions where the target type has a wider range than the source type. Setting this mode has no bearing on whether lossy conversions are permitted; this is
controlled with the |
ALL_LOSSY,ALL_NON_LOSSY |
When this mode is set, all supported type conversions are permitted, whether or not they are lossy conversions. |
ALL_SIGNED |
Treat promoted integer types as signed values (the default behavior). |
ALL_UNSIGNED |
Treat promoted integer types as unsigned values. |
ALL_SIGNED,ALL_UNSIGNED |
Treat promoted integer types as signed if possible, otherwise as unsigned. |
[empty] | When This mode is the default. |
When an integer type is promoted, its signedness is not preserved. By default, the slave treats all such
values as signed. Beginning with MySQL 5.6.13, you can control this behavior using ALL_SIGNED
,
ALL_UNSIGNED
, or both. (Bug#15831300) ALL_SIGNED
tells the slave to treat all promoted integer types as signed; ALL_UNSIGNED
instructs it to treat these as unsigned. Specifying both causes the slave to treat the value as signed if
possible, otherwise to treat it as unsigned; the order in which they are listed is not significant. Neither
ALL_SIGNED
nor ALL_UNSIGNED
has any effect if at
least one of ALL_LOSSY
or ALL_NONLOSSY
is not also
used.
Changing the type conversion mode requires restarting the slave with the new slave_type_conversions
setting.
Supported conversions. Supported conversions between different but similar data types are shown in the following list:
Between any of the integer types TINYINT
, SMALLINT
, MEDIUMINT
, INT
, and BIGINT
.
This includes conversions between the signed and unsigned versions of these types.
Lossy conversions are made by truncating the source value to the maximum (or minimum) permitted
by the target column. For insuring non-lossy conversions when going from unsigned to signed
types, the target column must be large enough to accommodate the range of values in the source
column. For example, you can demote TINYINT UNSIGNED
non-lossily to
SMALLINT
, but not to TINYINT
.
Between any of the decimal types DECIMAL
, FLOAT
, DOUBLE
, and NUMERIC
.
FLOAT
to DOUBLE
is a non-lossy
conversion; DOUBLE
to FLOAT
can only
be handled lossily. A conversion from DECIMAL(
to M
,D
)DECIMAL(
where M'
,D'
)
and M'
=> M
is non-lossy; for any case where D'
=> D
, M'
< M
, or both, only a lossy conversion can be
made. D'
< D
For any of the decimal types, if a value to be stored cannot be fit in the target type, the value is rounded down according to the rounding rules defined for the server elsewhere in the documentation. See Section 12.19.4, "Rounding Behavior", for information about how this is done for decimal types.
Between any of the string types CHAR
, VARCHAR
, and TEXT
, including conversions between different widths.
Conversion of a CHAR
, VARCHAR
, or
TEXT
to a CHAR
, VARCHAR
,
or TEXT
column the same size or larger is never lossy. Lossy
conversion is handled by inserting only the first N
characters of the string on the slave, where N
is the
width of the target column.
Replication between columns using different character sets is not supported.
Between any of the binary data types BINARY
, VARBINARY
, and BLOB
, including conversions between different widths.
Conversion of a BINARY
, VARBINARY
, or
BLOB
to a BINARY
, VARBINARY
, or BLOB
column the same
size or larger is never lossy. Lossy conversion is handled by inserting only the first N
bytes of the string on the slave, where N
is the width of the target column.
Between any 2 BIT
columns of any 2 sizes.
When inserting a value from a BIT(
column into a M
)BIT(
column, where M'
)
, the most significant bits of the M'
> M
BIT(
columns are cleared
(set to zero) and the M'
)M
bits of the BIT(
value are set as
the least significant bits of the M
)BIT(
column. M'
)
When inserting a value from a source BIT(
column into a target M
)BIT(
column, where M'
)
, the maximum possible value for the M'
< M
BIT(
column is assigned;
in other words, an "all-set" value is
assigned to the target column.M'
)
Conversions between types not in the previous list are not permitted.
Replication type conversions in MySQL 5.5.3 and
earlier. Prior to MySQL 5.5.3, with row-based binary logging, you could not replicate between different
INT
subtypes, such as from TINYINT
to BIGINT
, because changes to columns of these types were represented
differently from one another in the binary log when using row-based logging. (However, you could replicate
from BLOB
to TEXT
using row-based replication
because changes to BLOB
and TEXT
columns were
represented using the same format in the binary log.)
Supported conversions for attribute promotion when using row-based replication prior to MySQL 5.5.3 are shown in the following table:
From (Master) | To (Slave) |
---|---|
BINARY |
CHAR |
BLOB |
TEXT |
CHAR
|
BINARY |
DECIMAL |
NUMERIC
|
NUMERIC |
DECIMAL
|
TEXT |
BLOB |
VARBINARY |
VARCHAR |
VARCHAR |
VARBINARY
|
In all cases, the size or width of the column on the slave must be equal to or greater than
that of the column on the master. For example, you could replicate from a CHAR(10)
column on the master to a column that used BINARY(10)
or BINARY(25)
on the slave, but
you could not replicate from a CHAR(10)
column on the master to BINARY(5)
column on the slave.
Any unique index (including primary keys) having a prefix must use a prefix of the same length on both master and slave; in such cases, differing prefix lengths are disallowed. It is possible to use a nonunique index whose prefix length differs between master and slave, but this can cause serious performance issues, particularly when the prefix used on the master is longer. This is due to the fact that 2 unique prefixes of a given length may no longer be unique at a shorter length; for example, the words catalogue and catamount have the 5-character prefixes catal and catam, respectively, but share the same 4-character prefix (cata). This can lead to queries that use such indexes executing less efficiently on the slave, when a shorter prefix is employed in the slave' definition of the same index than on the master.
For DECIMAL
and NUMERIC
columns, both the mantissa (M) and the number of decimals (D) must be the same size or larger on the slave as compared with
the master. For example, replication from a NUMERIC(5,4)
to a DECIMAL(6,4)
worked, but not from a NUMERIC(5,4)
to a DECIMAL(5,3)
.
Prior to MySQL 5.5.3, MySQL replication did not support attribute promotion of any of the following data types to or from any other data type when using row-based replication: